Botswanan Persecution

As indicated by the seventeenth century and just about every waking moment since, the natural inhabitants of locations have been overrun, enslaved, and just viewed as an overall burden. They have not garnered the slightest bit of compassion or respect reserved for every human being; they've been relegated to subhuman status. While this is being combated, people are still using indigenous groups as walking floor mats.

 In particular, the Botswanan government is refusing to give the Bushmen (San, !Kung, etc.) living on the Central Kalahari Game Reserve access to the necessities of life such as water and game in an attempt to get them to immigrate elsewhere. The motivation toward the forced immigration is the bountiful amounts of diamonds on the reserve desired by the government, enough diamonds to make, and already have made, Botswana the richest country in Africa per capita. In short, the Botswana government is murdering people via dehydration in order to rape their lands to make a profit.

The ethical quandary is evident and I believe that those in charge of making this decision have such messed up moral compasses that I doubt they can even function properly. I feel like this goes beyond the water though. This pushes into the realm of rights and not the obvious human right violations. For example, why does the Botswanan government have the rights over this area of land? Who does it actually belong to: the people who have been sustained off of it for thousands of years or those who have the most guns? Why did only two out of the three High Court judges say they were constitutionally allowed to live on the land? Why does the set of rules of a foreign entity apply to the Bushmen? This is the root of the territorial conflicts in Africa. This is the cause of the violence and wars. People shouldn't infringe on others' ways of life, especially not by attempting to eradicate it.

-------
Sources:

1) Booker, Christopher. "Bushmen are victims of a water war by Botswana - Telegraph." Telegraph.co.uk - Telegraph online, Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph - Telegraph. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6292724/Bushmen-are-victims-of-a-water-war-by-Botswana.html>.

Historical Significance of the Bushmen

The video above portrays the race known to the Western world as the Bushmen. The particular tribe they're following is the San, a tribe regionally, ethnically, and linguistically similar to the !Kung. While the video doesn't directly speak of the !Kung, it is still valuable in that the tribes are so similar that comparisons can be drawn.

If one subscribes to the Eastern Africa theory of evolution, then this video is a shocking glimpse into the origins of man. They have markers in their genes foreign to all other races making them the "root of the tree". Some say the Bushmen may date as far back as 60,000 years. Located in the Kalahari Desert, the sandy sea of isolation potentially preserved their culture for thousands of years. While this is making the bold and improbable assumption that the Bushmen haven't vastly changed, it still does provide a valuable contrast between the decisions of migrating south or north during the early stages of human development.

 For those that moved north, they became the other ethnic groups of the world. They evolved into the modern, space-traveling, skyscraper building, technological socialites that populate the vast majority of the world today, however. Those that moved south appear to have sustained themselves off of a stagnated hunter-gathering existence. It's interesting to think that this is how early humans survived. Think about this, you are related to them. Somewhere along the evolution tree we, as a whole, branched off from them. This has tremendous anthropological and historical significance; historians are always stuck looking at vague clues and deducing what might have been. With the Bushmen, historical anthropologists have a live show to the culture of early humans. They can actually see where we were as a species and truly appreciate how far we've come.

A lot of people will condescendingly look upon these people and say, "What a pity? How can they live like this?" I retort, how can you determine our way of life is better? How do you define a "good" life? By the number of years lived? By the number of Facebook posts you have? The fact of the matter is they've survived as long as we have and they'd probably outlive us if our atomic bombs didn't affect them.

-------
Source:

1) "The San Bushmen of South Africa."Bradshaw Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. <http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/bushman/index.php

!Kung Politics

    As a small, nomadic group in the Kalahari, the !Kung people have little to no say in the national government. In fact, they are not even recognized in the national constitution of Botswana as one of the tribal groups. Because of this, the !Kung have been oppressed and their rights are being taken away, gradually, while they are forced to live in smaller sections of southern Africa.

    Within the tribes, the !Kung people focus on enforcing social consensus when determining the progression and function of the tribe. Generally, there are a few hereditary leaders but they exist with little to no power over the community as a whole. Social ridicule and  sometimes execution function as a means of keeping a sense of social order throughout the tribe. The politics among the !Kung people function as there is no person or group that has any more power than another, helping to maintain peace and order within the tribe.

Source:

2005. Cultural Analysis: !Kung San Politics. Electronic Document,
   http://social-shadow.tripod.com/politics.html

Gender Roles

Gender roles in the !Kung society are not defined with any sense of rigidity; women can be hunters while men can be gatherers and the exact opposite can be true as well. Children generally have the choice to choose whichever way they want to provide sustenance to the community. In politics, both men and women discuss the ways the tribe is to be governed, as there is no central political group. Marriage tends to exist between men in their twenties and women in their teens. Women are traditionally the caregivers of the children, functioning in collective mothering much of the time, spending much of the day sitting around talking while they watch their children play. Women, in fact, do actually provide the majority of sustenance to the community, by either hunting or gathering as they choose. Women even tend to bring children with them while they go on their foraging expeditions, adding to their heavy load. Men have learned to domesticate animals, keeping livestock such as cattle.

Above: Communal care-giving typical of the !Kung women

Source:
Draper, Patricia, "Institutional, Evolutionary, and Demographic Contexts of Gender Roles: A Case Study of !Kung Bushmen" (1997). Anthropology Faculty Publications. Paper 4. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/4

The Language

Probably the most popularly known of the characteristics of the !Kung people, their language is a mixture of clicks and syllables which follow real grammar and vocabulary. The exclamation point in their name is in fact a click. The language of the !Kung people, as described in this video, may give contemporary anthropologists a glimpse of the global population's ancient language, and where languages may have branched from there.

Click Here to see the video

Location

A satellite image taken by nasa of the kalahari desert

The Kalahari

The Kung are located in isolated areas of Angola, Botswana and Namibia, The kalahari, a semi arid desert region where they live has few trees and consist of mostly of brush, grass covered low hills and flat lands.During the rainy season the rain can vary from five to forty inches. Winters in the Kalahari are cold with tempratures dropping below freezing and in the summer it can rise to a scorching 100F. The kalahari stretches 350,000 square miles across southern Africa. Unlike a true desert during a good rainy season it's huge tracts for grazing can support a large variety of animals.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources: "The !kung of the kalahari desert" Shostak, M. (1981). Nisa: The life and words of a !Kung woman. New York: Random House.

Change in !kung societies

Foreign encroachment has dramatically influenced the !kung way of life over the decades.Globalization and increased contact with Europeans have now changed the kung! living arrangement's,  diet, and religion. gender roles are now becoming more apparent as !kung families become increasingly more dependent on males.  !kung men would generally hunt while the women foraged for food. The foods that the women collected would provide nearly 60-80% of the food for the entire group, and if men wanted to forage or a woman wanted to hunt they could without worry of shame or ridicule from their peers.
  over the years foreign influences have encouraged !kung men to seek jobs outside of the village. European descended settlers hire them for paid field labor. Renowned as trappers They use their hunting skills for monetary profit instead of just sustenance.This access to wealth has created in balances between the equality of genders in !kung society. Men are now seen as more important due to the families financial reliance on them. The introduction of money has also been detrimental to !kung life and communities. The old ideals of sharing are forgotten as !kung men start to hoard their wealth.!kung villages now consist of houses spread far apart with closed doors whereas  !kung communities of the past were usually very intimate, with small huts clustered together in a circle facing inwards with no doors. This has led to a rise in incidents of domestic violence as outside intervention is restricted  by the more private dwellings.

Above: A !Kung woman with her children in front of a hut with a closed door. She wears more modern apparel
Below: Men in native garb dance in front of traditional !kung huts

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Above: A !Kung woman with her children in front of a hut with a closed door. She wears more modern apparel
Below: Men in native garb dance in front of traditional !kung huts

Sources.
"The !kung san: Men, women and work" by Richardson Borshay Lee Ch 9
"Transformation of the Kalahari !kung" Jhone E Yellen